2) The two general construction workers I interviewed explained that their alternative evaluation process is rather simple. Since they are accustomed to the standard hard hat that they are provided, this is usually the alternative they opt for. However, if possible, both did explain that they seek lighter options or hard hats that don't feel as suffocating. For example, one of the scaffolders explained that he prefers white hard hats over yellow hard hats because he feels that it attracts less heat. Other than that distinction, the style and quality of these hard hats were explained to be relatively consistent, with a price range of usually under $15. Since these workers are used to this form of equipment, they explained that they do not explicitly seek out weather-protective headgear, but would definitely welcome the idea. As for the roofer I interviewed, he explained that he had not considered protective equipment until recently. He has been working in the roofing industry for the last 7 years and explained that he has recently noticed the frequency in which roofers get struck by lightning. Interestingly enough, he explained that he initially sought after protective headgear that resemble the hard hats of general construction workers. However, he soon realized that those helmets would not provide much protection against hazardous weather conditions. The reason for why he considered a hard hat was because it is lightweight and rather inexpensive. More than the money, he emphasized the importance of comfortability intertwined with durability---similar to the scaffolders, he did not want any gear that would feel too stifling.
3) As for where these interviewees went in order to make these purchases, the scaffolders explained that their construction company provided their hard hats for them. Thus, they did not need to seek an external vendor for the protective equipment. As for the roofer, he explained that he went online when searching for different protective headgear. However, he expressed that there weren't any vendors that sold weather-protective equipment designed for roofers specifically. As a result, he did not end up making any purchases (or, at least not yet). When asked where he would like to make such a purchase, the roofer explained that he would prefer to try on any specific headgear before finalizing a transaction. This would be to ensure that the equipment is comfortable and practical for the demands of his occupation. Therefore, he expressed interest in buying equipment from a store. As for the method of transaction, he explained that he would probably use credit because that is how he makes most of his purchases (whether it be big or small).
4) The two general construction workers and the roofer I interviewed did not have to purchase a new product in order to fulfill their need. As previously mentioned, the scaffolders received their hard hat from their company, and the roofer did not end up purchasing protective headgear yet. However, in order to assess the 'rightness' of a purchase, all three workers expressed the idea of expectations. If an order was able to fulfill expectations, the workers explained that a purchase becomes deemed as a good idea. If an order was able to exceed expectations, then a purchase becomes deemed as a great idea. However, if a purchase does not fulfill or meet the previously held expectations, the three interviewees expressed that a purchase becomes deemed as "disappointing" or even "worthless."
5) Based on my interviews, I was able to conclude that my interviewees do not engage in a specific alternative evaluation. This is simply due to the fact that the scaffolders I interviewed do not necessarily engage in seeking a different alternative aside from the hard hat they are provided by their company. As for the roofer, I realized that he did engage in an alternative evaluation---however, the alternative he sought after was a product similar to that of a hard hat because that was the only available option on the current market. All three workers, however, expressed that they would welcome the idea of a product that provides protection from perilous environmental conditions, like lightning strikes. The roofer was especially adamant of a more weather-protective headgear because of how his occupation makes him particularly susceptible to potential lightning strikes.
6) Based on my interviews, I believe I have to engage with more potential customers in order to make a conclusive decision in terms of how my segment perceives alternative evaluation. This is because of the sheer fact that only one of my three interviewees (the roofer) expressed experience in engaging in the alternative evaluation process. However, one of the most significant realization I was able to make is that the potential product I offer (weather-protective headgear) will need to sufficiently address my customers' expectations. This is one of the primary determinants in regards to how a customer engages in post-purchase evaluation.
I like how at the very beginning you included a reminder of what your product is, and also why you are interviewing these people. I wish, though, that you interviewed three people like the assignment listed, not two. It felt like everything was addressed in your interviews. In your conclusion it almost felt like you were summarizing or repeating what was found in the interviews.
ReplyDelete